I watched a few seconds of a Youtube video, rebutting 8 Questions No Atheist Can Answer! So, I decided to stop and see how I would/could answer these 8 questions:
1. If morality isn’t objective, does that mean Hitler never did anything wrong? Are our actions just a consequence of nature?
Objectively wrong, no Hitler did not do anything objectively wrong. To his point of view, what he did was moral and just. Morality is subjective, and what he did was subjectively wrong to most people, but not all. Our actions are a consequence of nature.
2. If you’re meaning to life is subjective and your sense of purpose in life is truly meaningless when you take into account how brief it is in the geologic time scale and how the universe will one day be destroyed, why do you try to hold others to your subjective moral standard? Why and HOW can you judge God?
I don’t hold others to my subjective moral standard, but as a society and as a species, it is in our best interest to develop a SUBJECTIVE moral code. Knowing this is our only life make it imperative to not waste it being cruel to others. I can’t judge god, god is an imaginary character. It is like asking how I can judge Spiderman or the Hulk. It is a nonsense question.
3. What proof do you have to say that God doesn’t exist? To prove that God doesn’t exist, you have to logically have a reason as to why the universe came into being out of an eternal realm of nothingness.
No, I do not have and have no obligation to disprove a god. I am not the one making a positive claim. However, the concept of an all powerful, infinite, all loving, but unchanging god, that is separate from time and space, but personal seems pretty self refuting. The concept of eternal and nothingness is meaningless before time and space.
4. Where and why did the universe pop into existence out of the “Big Bang”? Where did the Multiverse pop out of? If there was no universe made out of space-time, does that mean it just popped out of an eternal realm of nothing?
This is just the second part of question 3, broken out. The concept of “Where” is meaningless before space-time. Why? is an odd question. Does the sun need a reason to shine? Apply the same to Multiverse. Yes, our present universe can just pop out of nothing, it is called quantum fluctuations. Happens all the time.
5. Where did life come from and how? How do you explain the fine-tuning of the universe? That means that there are hundreds of thousands of conditions that needed to meet so that our universe could support life or even exist.
I am not a biologist that studies abiogenesis and I suspect you aren’t either, but let me muddle through this disjointed question. Life arose over 3.5 billion year ago, there are many theories of the origin. I personally believe it began either in mud, or around hydrothermal vents. I am not a physicist, but the fine tuning argument is poorly understood. Fine tuning is a Descriptive, not Prescriptive values. They are descriptions of what the values are. There are not hundreds of thousands of values. The entire universe is bounded by: Electromagnetism, Gravity, Strong Nuclear Force, and the Weak Nuclear Force. I only count 4 fundamental forces. Finally, life began and evolved to work within these limits, no the other way around.
6. Why did the first organism need to consume to survive if it came into existence out of star dust? What drove it to survive?
It did not pop into existence in star dust. Life almost certainly began in the vast oceans, where there was tremendous amounts of chemical energy. When that chemical energy ran out, photosynthesis evolved to harness the sun. The first life on earth was almost certainly RNA based. It had no drive to survive, like a falling object has no desire to fall, it just does.
7. Where did DNA come from and how did something so complicated randomly come into existence? It is said that one single DNA can hold the equivalent to 4,500 books of information.
Before DNA was RNA, which is derived from Amino Acids. Amino acids are VERY common, and can even be found in the near vacuum of space. The early oceans were a literal soup of amino acids. Take amino acids, add energy and time and you will get RNA. Make enough RNA and there will be self replicating RNA. Put self replicating RNA in a phospholipid membrane, and you have a simple cell. The second part is a statement referring to a metaphor. DNA is not a book.
8. What evidence is there for the changing of kinds? We all know that there are thousands of species of the same kind of animal, like there are several different kinds of dogs. But there in nothing in the record of evolution that proves that one kind of animal, like a fish, can evolve into a human. Cats are always cat and humanoids are always humanoids. Some people say that because we all share DNA, that we are therefore all related. However, DNA and matter can merely be the mechanism God used to create all animals with and he made each slightly different.
Kinds is a meaningless term. There are entire museums and warehouses FULL of transitional fossils. I don’t understand the ‘thousands of species of the same kind of animal’. A species is a very specific definition. It is members of a population that can mate and produce viable offspring. The evolution of humans is intently researched and beyond the scope of this humble blog post. Cats are not always cats and humanoids are not human. You could not mate with an homo habilis, erectus, etc. Maybe, maybe with a Heidelbergensis, but I doubt it. Where are all these other humanoids? They are all extinct. We are all related, humans, dogs, whales, potatoes, crabs, grass…we all share DNA. What’s the point? Finally, we have a cop out here with guided evolution. Why add god when natural selection is the simpler answer?